Credit Cards

Comprehensive credit and loan news coverage

Recently...

Archive
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
 

Chase Manhattan Bank facing court action

30 January 2005

Legal action has been undertaken by a New York law firm on the behalf of a Chase Manhattan credit card holder against Chase Manhattan on the allegation that the bank misled customers with an interest rate promotion.

Legal action has been undertaken by a New York law firm on the behalf of a Chase Manhattan credit card holder against Chase Manhattan on the allegation that the bank misled customers with an interest rate promotion.

The law firm Whalen & Tusa, P.C., which specializes in litigation to protecting the rights of consumers abused by corporate fraud, deception and mis-billing, has been retained to bring the action against Chase Manhattan Bank.

The action alleges that Chase (ASQ: CCF) misled customers into believing that they would get six months duration at a low percentage rate (APR) on balance transfers or cash advances. It appears in the offer to the cardholder in question that Chase cardholders can carry those balance transfers at the low promotional rate for six months or longer.

The credit card holder is said to have believed that any funds involved in the promotion would be subject to the full six months at the low rate while any payments made to the card would be credited against the usual balance which was subject to a higher APR.

Instead, Chase took any payment the credit card holder made for current purchases and always allocated that money to the balance transfer at the low interest rate and not to the money paid for current purchases on the card that month.

As a result, the cardholder now had a balance at a very high finance charge and less of the credit card loan at the low APR. The cardholder never got the chance to pay off the amount at the high finance charge until the cardholder paid off all the promotional rate loan money.



Source: Datamonitor via Yahoo


Author:  
Email:    
Topic:    
Content:

All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.


Related Articles


 
Mortgage News
Law News
Life Insurance
Legal Action

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z