Credit Cards

Comprehensive credit and loan news coverage

Recently...

Archive
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
 

CREW Files Ethics Complaint Against Sen. Santorum; Breaks Senate Gift Ban Rule by Accepting Improper Bank Loan

24 February 2006

Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee alleging that Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) violated the Senate Gift Rule by accepting a mortgage from The Philadelphia Trust Company, a bank that serves affluent clients.


CREW based its complaint on a story by Will Bunch that first appeared in the Philadelphia Daily News on February 21, 2006. According to the article, in 2002, Sen. Santorum and his wife received a $500,000 five-year mortgage for their Leesburg, VA home from Philadelphia Trust. The bank's web site states that "banking services are available only to investment advisory clients whose portfolios we manage, oversee or administer." The Daily News reporter called the bank, which confirmed that it offers mortgages only to investors and not to the general public.


Sen. Santorum's financial disclosure forms for 2001 and 2002 show no investment portfolio with Philadelphia Trust. Moreover, in 2002, the year Sen. Santorum obtained the mortgage, his financial disclosure forms indicate that his investments did not exceed $145,000.


Rule 35 of the Senate Code of Official Conduct bans Senators from accepting gifts and specifically includes "loans" within the definition of "gifts." The Gift Rule also provides that Senators can accept loans from banks and other financial institutions on terms "generally available to the public."


CREW's complaint alleges that because a "loan" constitutes a "gift," because Sen. Santorum did not meet Philadelphia Trust's clientele criteria, and because the Senator was not, in fact, a bank client at the time he received the mortgage, Sen. Santorum violated the Gift Rule.


CREW's complaint also notes that Philadelphia Trust officials have contributed a total of $23,250 to Sen. Santorum's campaign and his political action committee, America's Foundation.


Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, stated "the public has the right to expect that Senators -- just like everybody else -- will follow the rules. Sen. Santorum's decision to accept a loan not available to other people in his financial position demonstrates his contempt for the rules. This is particularly ironic given that Sen. Santorum has long attempted to position himself as the poster child for public morality."


Sloan continued, "ethical trespasses have become the norm for Sen. Santorum, which begs the question: how serious is Majority Leader Frist in changing the way in which the Senate does its business, considering he appointed Sen. Santorum to be the point person on ethics reform?"


"Although there is no evidence that Sen. Santorum has used his official position to benefit Philadelphia Trust, the receipt of the loan from the bank creates exactly the sort of appearance of impropriety that the Gift Rule was designed to address."


A copy of CREW's complaint is available on its website, http://www.citizensforethics.org.


------


Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a non-profit, progressive legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions.


For more information, please visit http://www.citizensforethics.org or contact Naomi Seligman Steiner at 202-588-5565 or press@citizensforethics.org.


http://www.usnewswire.com/

Source: usnewswire


Author:  
Email:    
Topic:    
Content:

All trademarks and copyrighted information contained herein are the property of their respective owners.


Related Articles


 
Mortgage News
Law News
Life Insurance
Legal Action

A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z